|
|
Quantitative precipitation deviation correction of EC model based on frequency matching |
Zhou Wei1,4, Wei Qing2, Yang Kangquan1,4, Chen Maoqiang3 |
1. Sichuan Provincial Meteorology Observatory,Chengdu 610072; 2. Sichuan Lightning Protection Center,Chengdu 610072; 3. Neijiang Meteorology Bureau,Neijiang 641000; 4. Heavy Rain and Drought-Flood Disaster in Plateau and Basin Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province,Chengdu 610072 |
|
|
Abstract In order to improve the prediction effect of the model,this paper uses the EC model precipitation forecast data and the actual precipitation data from May to September 2018 to 2020 in the southern Sichuan Basin,and uses frequency matching method to correct,analyze and test the 24-hour cumulative precipitation of the EC model.The results show that when the precipitation threshold is less than 25.0 mm,there is obvious wet deviation in EC quantitative precipitation forecast.On the contrary,there is weak dry deviation.The results of this study provide support for improving the precipitation forecast ability of related regions.
|
Received: 10 March 2023
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
李俊,杜钧,陈超君.降水偏差订正的频率(或面积)匹配方法介绍和分析[J].气象,2014,40(5):580-588.
|
[2] |
曹萍萍,肖递祥,徐栋夫,等.基于概率匹配的西南区域模式定量降水订正试验[J].气象科技,2018,46(1):102-111.
|
[3] |
苏翔,袁慧玲,朱跃建.四种定量降水预报客观订正方法对比研究[J].气象学报,2021,79(1):132-149.
|
[4] |
李莉,李应林,田华,等.T213全球集合预报系统性误差订正研究[J].气象,2011,37(1):31-38.
|
[5] |
霍达.2017年35月T639、ECMWF及日本模式中期预报性能检验[J].气象,2017,43(8):1016-1021.
|
[6] |
任宏昌.2017年68月T639、ECMWF及日本模式中期预报性能检验[J].气象,2017,43(11):1439-1445.
|
[7] |
尹姗,任宏昌.2017年911月T639、ECMWF及日本模式中期预报性能检验[J].气象,2018,44(2):326-333.
|
[8] |
肖玉华,赵静,蒋丽娟.数值模式预报性能的地域性特点初步分析[J].暴雨灾害,2010,29(4):322-327.
|
|
|
|