地市级气象计量实验室气压比对结果分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract With the construction of prefecture-level meteorological metrology laboratories,the national measurement comparison organized by China Meteorological Administration cannot meet the needs of a large number of prefecture-level measurement laboratories in time.In view of this situation,Sichuan institution of meteorological metrology verification takes the primary pressure laboratory which has participated in the national meteorological measurement comparison as the leading laboratory.The air pressure reserve laboratory,Ganzi metrology laboratory and Liangshan metrology laboratory are taken as the comparison laboratory.By comparison experiment,the consistency of the results of the pressure gauge in the comparative laboratory is verified.The experimental results show that the measurement results of the three reference laboratories are in good agreement with those of the leading laboratory,and the measurement work of the pressure sensor can be carried out normally.This comparison method can also provide reference for the measurement comparison of prefecture-level meteorological metrology laboratories in other provinces.

Key words： meteorology metrology laboratory comparison prefecture-level meteorological metrology laboratory

Received: 29 September 2021

ZTFLH:

TB935

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Yang Tao
	Huang Xiaojing
	Zheng Liang

Cite this article:

Yang Tao,Huang Xiaojing,Zheng Liang. Analysis of air pressure comparison results in prefecture-level meteorological metrology laboratory[J]. Meteorological Hydrological and Marine Instrument, 2022, 39(3): 11-14.

URL:

http://www.qxswhy.com/EN/ OR http://www.qxswhy.com/EN/Y2022/V39/I3/11

[1]	高楠,李俊,徐玥,等.实验室新进人员比对方案及实施[J].计量与测试技术,2021,48(3):57-58,64.
[2]	李常春,常克昊,刘禹杉.几种异常值判别准则在气象计量数据处理中的应用[J].电子测量技术,2020,43(23):68-72.
[3]	李建英,于贺军,王有利.大气压力量值比对结果评价[J].气象科技,2014,42(1):73-76.
[4]	肖建辉,张红英,武向娟,等.西北区域气象计量检定实验室量值比对分析[J].气象科技,2015,43(6):1019-1024.
[5]	党选发,黄蕊,刘永强,等.西北区域气象计量实验室综合能力比对结果分析[J].气象科技,2014,42(1):62-67.
[6]	褚进华,唐修雄,矫健,等.能见度仪校准系统的不确定度评定分析[J].电子测量与仪器学报,2020,34(2):180-187.
[7]	刘昕,边泽强,李松奎.标准皮托管校准系数测量及不确定度评定分析[J].电子测量技术,2020,43(14):50-54.
[8]	陈曦,沙奕卓,杨尚军.流量式雨量检定装置在气象计量中应用[J].电子测量技术,2012,35(5):6-9.
[9]	陈涛,杨涛.杯式风速传感器检定量值线性延伸方法探讨[J].电子测量技术,2017,40(9):238-240.
[10]	蒋薇,张玘,汪静.装备可计量性的相关性模型研究与分析[J].电子测量与仪器学报,2012,26(4):299-304.
[11]	薛生虎,李东升,叶子弘,等.基于多传感器融合技术的PCR仪温度校准系统[J].仪器仪表学报,2011,32(6):1232-1237.
[12]	冯慧,李松奎.湿度传感器现场检定和实验室检定结果的不确定度对比分析[J].电子测量技术,2020,43(11):49-52.
[13]	杨军,张力,李新良.动态计量技术发展中的几个关键问题[J].计测技术,2021,41(2):8-21.
[14]	苗洁,邹丽,徐珊,等.省级气象检定实验室内部计量比对结果分析[J].电子测量技术,2020,43(24):70-74.
[15]	姚静远,章焕,建森.PTB330气压传感器示值误差的测量不确定度评定[J].仪器仪表标准化与计量,2021,37(2):39-41.
[16]	王化吉.EMC传导发射测试测量不确定度评定[J].国外电子测量技术,2012,31(3):42-44.
[17]	魏明明.蒙特卡洛法与GUM评定测量不确定度对比分析[J].电子测量与仪器学报,2018,32(11):17-25.
[18]	胡红波,孙桥,杜磊.GUM S1与基于贝叶斯方法的不确定度评估比较[J].计量学报,2017,38(4):517-520.
[19]	范巧成,匡荣,邢成岗,等.试论测量不确定度与误差理论的关系[J].计量学报,2017,38(3):380-384.
[20]	周娇,王敬喜,陈成新.耐电压测试仪计量比对结果与归一化偏差[J].中国计量,2018,23(10):64-67.
[21]	蒋雪萍.归一化偏差(En值)算法与实验室检测能力质量控制[J].中国计量,2018,23(4):107-109.
[22]	况严,黄元媛,邓恺.燃油加油机检定装置计量比对结果归一化偏差[J].计量技术,2019,63(12):45-48.