昆明地基微波辐射计反演资料的质量评估分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: HTML (0 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The article utilizes data from Kunming sounding station from November 2023 to January 2024,as well as temperature and relative humidity data retrieved from the Airda-HTG4 ground-based multi-channel microwave radiometer at the same location.On the basis of quality control methods,the accuracy of temperature and humidity data for effective samples in the vertical direction at 08:00 and 20:00 was evaluated by adding spatial and temporal matching methods.The results showed that the overall temperature observation performance of the device was excellent,with an average system deviation of 0.67 ℃ for the entire layer,a root mean square error (RMS) of ≤3 ℃,and a correlation coefficient of 0.98.The average deviation of relative humidity is 0.11％,RMS≤20％. The correlation coefficient is 0.86,and the temperature detection accuracy is significantly better than that of humidity.Monthly observations show that the temperature RMS remains stable at 2.30～2.50 ℃,and the humidity RMS is 14％～17％,confirming the reliability of the equipment data.After quality control,the temperature error in the 5 000-10 000 m altitude layer (temperature<0 ℃) was significantly reduced,and the consistency with sounding data was enhanced.The original humidity data of this altitude layer has a significant negative deviation,and after quality control,the RMS has decreased to within 20％.Research has confirmed that the Airda-HTG4 device has outstanding temperature detection performance.

Key words： microwave radiometer temperature relative humidity

Received: 29 February 2024

ZTFLH:

P414.5

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Fu Chaoyu
	Lv Jing

Cite this article:

Fu Chaoyu,Lv Jing. Quality assessment and analysis of inversion data from Kunming ground-based microwave radiometer[J]. Meteorological Hydrological and Marine Instrument, 2025, 42(3): 56-59.

URL:

http://www.qxswhy.com/EN/ OR http://www.qxswhy.com/EN/Y2025/V42/I3/56

[1]	鲍艳松,钱程,闵锦忠,等.利用地基微波辐射计资料反演0～10 km大气温湿廓线试验研究[J].热带气象学报,2016,32(2) :163-171.
[2]	王志诚,王伟,励臣儒,等.浙江地区不同型号地基微波辐射计基数据质量控制及数据评估[J].气象水文海洋仪器,2024,41(6):42-46.
[3]	王小兰,王建凯,李炬.地基多通道微波辐射计反演大气温、湿廓线的试验研究[J].气象水文海洋仪器,2012,29(4):1-6.
[4]	王志诚,张雪芬,茆佳佳,等.不同天气条件下地基微波辐射计探测性能比对[J].应用气象学报,2018,29(3):282-295.
[5]	敖雪,王振会,徐桂荣,等.微波辐射计亮温观测质量控制研究[J].气象科学,2013,33(2):130-137.
[6]	朱磊,卢建平,雷连发,等.地基多通道微波辐射计大气廓线反演方法研究[J].火控雷达技术,2014,43(4):21-25.
[7]	乔贺,徐进,刘寅,等.地基微波辐射计温湿廓线对比试验初步分析研究[J].环境科学与管理,2019,44(10):129-134.
[8]	海阿静,于永杰,张志国,等.QFW-6000型地基多通道微波辐射计及典型天气过程观测结果分析[J].火控雷达技术,2016,45(4):6-11.
[9]	潘志祥,李艾卿.高空气象观测[M].北京:气象出版社,2013.